Sunday, April 8, 2012

"Harderer. Betterer. Fasterer. Strongerer." Brucennial 2012

Installation view of Brucennial 2012
Photo: Hillary Ganton

“Harderer. Betterer. Fasterer. Strongerer” are the catchwords of the 2012 Brucennial. It may very well be harder, better, faster and stronger than previous ones. The works of some 400 artists are displayed on four levels of a former theater. Paintings are hung salon style sometimes five or six rows high. Informal, wacky and fun, this multifaceted show makes the Whitney Biennial and New Museum Triennial look over-processed.

Installation view of Brucennial 2012
Photo: Vito Schnabel Web site

Organized by the art collective Bruce High Quality Foundation which was founded in 2001 by former Cooper Union students and Vito Schnabel, art dealer son of painter Julian Schnabel, the Brucennial is an invigorating take on what is happening now.

The first Brucennial was in 2008 with about 90 artists. Entitled “Doing it Again”, it took place in the Bushwick section of Brooklyn. The location of the following year's installment was the artist Ray Smith’s Gowanus studio. Called “Smithumenta” the show had 80 participants.  Brucennial reached Manhattan in 2010 when over 400 entrants exhibited at a Soho venue. The tag for this last one was “Miseducation”.

2012 is the exhibition's fourth edition. Typical of the Brucennials, unknowns mix with the famous. Works by Damian Hirst, Cindy Sherman and Jean-Michel Basquait are placed alongside those by originators many have not heard of. The overwhelming majority are the latter.


Installation view of Brucennial 2012
Photo: Vito Schnabel Web site

Sculptors, painters, video, installation and other art forms are present. It’s equal-opportunity for all. If not invited, those who wanted to be in the show just needed to ask the Bruce team - most were accepted. Yet, some vetting must have taken place for the good certainly out number the bad.

Penciled or penned names written directly on the walls identify artists. There was one lone business card affixed under a painting that told more. A number of creators were not indicated. On my visit I saw a few gallery checklists, one for each area. These, however, were easily overlooked as if authorship was not that important. It’s the art that matters.

Installation view of Brucennial 2012
Photo: Vito Schnabel Web site

Brucennial 2012 has something for everyone and plenty of room to take it all in. This viewer saw much of merit but won’t comment on any particular work. The fun is seeing the pieces unbiassed and making up one’s own mind.

The works are for sale. Prices are not listed. To find out more, contact the artist.

Is this, as the organizers state, “The single most important art exhibition in the history of the world. Ever.”? Doubtful. Nevertheless, it is democratic, fresh and full of life. The Brucennials appear to be on the right track.

Don’t postpone your visit. The exhibit closes on April 20th.



Brucennial 2012
Through April 20
159 Bleecker Street, (between Thompson and Sullivan Street),
Manhattan, New York
Wednesday to Sunday, noon to 6:00 p.m.

(Originally posted April 8, 2012)

Tuesday, February 14, 2012

Renoir's Captivating Parisians

Pierre-Auguste Renoir (1841–1919), La Promenade, 1875–76,
oil on canvas, 67 x 42 5/8 in. (170.2 x 108.3 cm)
The Frick Collection, New York
Photo: Michael Bodycomb

Links between senses have long been recognized. The sensation of sound may involuntarily give rise to a sense of color or vice versa. These associations are called synaesthesia and it happens upon entering the Frick Collection’s special exhibition, Renoir, Impressionism, and Full-Length Painting. The exuberant paintings sing.

Pierre-August Renoir’s La Promenade inspired the show. Henry Clay Frick purchased the work in 1914. Initially, he contemplated returning it but, lucky for us, he didn’t. It was the last Impressionist work to enter the collection.

The exhibit, as well as its catalogue, are curatorial triumphs for Colin B. Bailey, the Frick’s Deputy Director and Peter Jay Sharp Curator. Eight important full-length paintings from seven institutions join La Promenade for a look at the work which occupied Renoir in the early years of Impressionism, from the mid-1870s through the mid-1880s. They represent Renoir’s confident and kindly view of modernity - fashionable ladies and gentlemen, a ballerina, an actress, young acrobats, and a trio of dancing couples. This is the first time the museum’s East Gallery has been turned over for a temporary exhibit. The installation takes advantage of the room’s natural light and ample proportions.

Although the Impressionists are known for their easel-size canvases, Renoir preferred to work in a large format. He painted on big surfaces early in his career when he had been employed to make full-scale religious images in imitation of stain glass windows on blinds intended for export to missionary churches. In addition, he had decorated cafe walls with murals.

Landscapes and scenes of contemporary life fell under his observational powers. Rendered in an audacious style of bright hues, feathery brush work and inventive compositions, his work shocked contemporaries.

A tailor father and seamstress mother may account for his interest in and visual acuity for fashion. His paintings can be dated by the clothing worn by those portrayed. He lived during a changing world of politics and industrialization. Napoleon III’s Second French Empire ended and the Third Republic established. Baron Haussmann’s designs transformed Paris into a metropolis of wide boulevards and expansive gardens. The proliferation of street lights made evening strolls safer. Lights illuminated theaters and the just developing department stores, the grand magazins. New railway networks facilitated travel. People spent time outdoors in the city’s gardens or nearby Parisian suburbs now easily reached by train. A diverse social mix enjoyed leisure activities.

Portable umbrellas were produced, made possible by the 1852 invention of the light weight steel-ribbed frame. Cigarette smoking, which had crossed into France from Spain by 1830, became popular. Match manufacturing began making smoking more convenient. In fact, the safety match, received an award at the Paris “World Exhibition” of 1855.

In 1830, a French tailor invented the first functional sewing machine that sewed straight seams. By the mid-1800s, sewing machines were mass produced. The invention of synthetic dyes made new cloth colors possible. Stylish garments became accessible and available at different price points. Women could buy expensive outfits in a cheaper version.

Renoir’s La Promenade, the finest Impressionist work in the Frick Collection, is a glorious depiction of nineteenth-century society. It is a wintry bright day in a public garden. A young women ushers two little girls along a pathway. They are dressed in fur-trimmed outfits. The girls wear matching apparel. One warms her hands in a muff, made of white mink or swans down, while the other holds a fully dressed doll. Besides fur, their ensembles are embellished with silk and lace. In the upper right background, at least eleven figures are discernible along with two dogs, one black and one white.

(For a close view, see the painting's high-resolution image on Google Art Project.)

The work had long been described as a mother and her two children but a recent technical examination supports a different interpretation.

In the spring of 2011, La Promenade was sent to the Metropolitan Museum of Art’s conservation department. An infrared reflectogram revealed a distinct underlayer image of two female figures at the upper left side of the canvas. One was an elegantly dressed older women of obvious high social rank; the other was modestly attired. They were most likely meant to represent the mother and nanny of the three remaining figures. Renoir may have chosen to leave them out in order to give more space to the final the composition and focus attention on the foreground youths, who are now understood to be three sisters. The older one wears a type of schoolgirl skirt. Note the bit of white petticoat sticking out from the right side of her hem. Her casual loose hair is indicative of girlhood. Only children or young, unmarried females of seventeen or eighteen years-of-age wore their hair this way. An older women would not be outside in public with her tresses down. Married, mature women wore their hair styled and pinned up under bonnets or hats.

Pierre-Auguste Renoir (1841–1919), La Parisienne, 1874,
oil on canvas, 64 3/8 x 42 3⁄4 in. (163.2 x 108.3 cm)
Miss Gwendoline E. Davies Bequest, 1951
Photo: © Amgueddfa Cymru—National Museum Wales

Such is the case of the woman pictured in La Parisienne who dresses in a chic, outdoor blue silk walking outfit with matching hat, toque and gloves. She is the height of fashion with a shaped jacket, overskirt pulled into a bustle puffing the fabric out behind and underskirt with pleated flounces. When this canvas was painted in the early 1870s, bright blue and mauve were the “it” colors of the fashionable.

Blues, which dominates La Parisienne, highlight The Dancer placed nearby. This may be the first time both paintings are together since they were shown at the First Impressionist Exhibition in 1874.

Pierre-Auguste Renoir (1841–1919), The Dancer, 1874,
oil on canvas 56 1/8 x 37 1/8 in. (142.5 x 94.5 cm)
National Gallery of Art, Washington, D.C., Widener Collection
Photo: National Gallery of Art, Washington, DC

The Dancer is a light filled canvas of bravado brushstrokes and radical coloration. The young ballerina may be in front of a mirror checking herself or showing her progress to a ballet master. Pushing back her tutu, she gets a better view of her body placement. Her feet are placed in ballet fifth position, the fundamental position from which all classical technique is derived and the one dancers spend their whole lives trying to perfect. Her skin is tinged with blue, green and yellow. The dermis seems to pick up the color of her costume’s sash, bodice trim and hair bows. Renoir doesn’t miss describing the velvet neck choker, delicate hankie and jeweled bracelets. The painter even delineates the taut ribbons of new pink toe shoes pressing against the young girl’s flesh.

The model for The Dancer, La Parisienne, and older sister in La Promenade has been identified as the then aspiring actress Marie-Henriette-Alphonsine Grossin whose stage name was Madame Henriot. She became one of Renoir’s favorite models posing for the artist between 1874, when she was seventeen-years-old, and 1876. Modeling gave her income and public exposure. In the painting Madame Henriot “en travesti” (The Page), also in the show and hung to the right of La Parisienne, the actress is portrayed as a page.

Edgar Degas (1834-1917), Little Dancer Aged Fourteen, 1878-1881,
yellow wax, hair, ribbon, linen bodice, satin shoes, muslin tutu, wood base,
overall without base: 38 15/16 x 13 11/16 x 13 7/8 in. (98.9 x 34.7 x 35.2 cm)
weight: 49 lb. (22.226 kg)
Collection of Mr. and Mrs. Paul Mellon
National Gallery of Art, Washington, DC
Photo: ARTnews

A short digression: The ballerina as subject is usually associated with Edgar Degas who also took part in the Impressionist exhibitions. His Little Dancer Aged Fourteen, presented in the Sixth Impressionist Exhibition of 1881, was the only sculpture the artist ever put on public display. Made of wax, hair and clothing materials, it defied convention. She stands in the ballet fourth position which gives the dancer a balanced solid-base, allowing for the body’s elongation and improved alignment. Yet, compared to Renoir’s painted dancer who stands in the more difficult fifth, the little wax ballerina looks awkward. Part of the reason, I suggest, is that Renoir was incapable of rendering his models indifferently. He made them look good, better than they actually were in life. The actress Mademoiselle Henriot was not a particularly attractive woman but Renoir made her appealing. His was a benevolent view of mankind.

Pierre-Auguste Renoir (1841–1919), The Umbrellas (Les Parapluies), c. 1881–85,
oil on canvas, 71 x 45 in. (180.3 x 114.9 cm),
The National Gallery, London, Sir Hugh Lane Bequest, 1917
Photo: © The National Gallery, London / Art Resource, NY

The Umbrellas (Les Parapluies) is on a wall by itself across from La Parisienne. Begun about 1881, it was completed five years later. The work is bifurcated yet the blue toned pigments unite dissimilarities. On the right are four figures in Renoir’s early luminous Impressionistic manner. A well-dressed mother holding an open umbrella looks down at her two daughters. Their luxurious garments demonstrate wealth. Next to them, a younger woman with an upturned face is in the process of opening her umbrella. Her clothing is evidence of some means.

Pierre-Auguste Renoir (1841–1919), Detail of The Umbrellas (Les Parapluies),
c. 1881–85, oil on canvas,
71 x 45 in. (180.3 x 114.9 cm),
The National Gallery, London, Sir Hugh Lane Bequest, 1917
Photo: ARTstor

On the painting’s left, a dapper man with top hat holds an open umbrella in his gloved right hand. He appears to protect the bare-headed woman standing before him. Her garments as well as the hat box with leather strap that she carries signifies she is a milliner's assistant. This pair as well as the background figures and umbrellas were painted in Renoir’s later linear, subdued style which emphasized form, line and volume rather than brushstrokes and colors.

Pierre-Auguste Renoir (1841–1919), Detail of The Umbrellas (Les Parapluies),
c. 1881–85, oil on canvas,
71 x 45 in. (180.3 x 114.9 cm),
The National Gallery, London, Sir Hugh Lane Bequest, 1917
Photo: ARTstor

Costume historians would recognize the shopgirl's fitted clothing as the up-to-date English fashion of the mid-1880‘s. The figures on the right are fashionistas of the earlier 1880s. The mother wears a 1881 ensemble characterized by a high bustle and tiered skirt. Renoir, as always, is meticulous in his clothing descriptions. Note the the footwear of the four right figures: both girls appear to be wearing Baby Jane type children shoes but the older sister sports dark spats covering her instep and ankle; the mother has on pumps with contrasting beige spat; and, peaking out from the other woman’s pleated skirt, are her shoes’ plain tips. Other well-observed details are the mother’s bracelets and the small buttons on the inside of her right hand glove. The little girl’s possessive grasp of her toy hoop and stick, the older sister’s affectionate touch on her younger sibling’s shoulder, the overlapping of numerous umbrellas and figures, make this one of Renoir’s best paintings.

Gustave Caillebotte (1848-1894) A Paris Street; Rainy Day, 1877,
oil on canvas, 83 1/2 x 108 3/4 in. (212.2 x 276.2 cm),
Charles H. and Mary F. S. Worchester Collection, 1964
Art Institute of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
Photo: ARTstor

I can not help but bring up another famous “umbrella” painting, Gustave Caillebotte’s A Paris Street; Rainy Day. Renoir and his close friend and fellow artist Caillebotte both exhibited at the 1877 Third Impressionist Exhibition. Caillebotte’s painting was in that show and, no doubt, Renoir saw it. Like Ford Motel Ts, the umbrellas in Caillebotte’s 1877 work and Renoir’s The Umbrellas (Les Parapluies) of 1881-5 confirm the devices early uniformity.

Pierre-Auguste Renoir (1841–1919), Dance at Bougival, 1883,
0il on canvas, 71 5/8 x 38 5/8 in. (181.9 x 98.1 cm)
Museum of Fine Arts, Boston, Picture Fund
Photo: © 2012 Museum of Fine Arts, Boston

In 1883, Renoir was preparing intensely for an exhibition and produced three canvases of dancing couples: Dance in the City, Dance in the Country and Dance at Bougival. They are all at the Frick. The later is the most romantic of the trio and charged with an eroticism the other two lack.

Pierre-Auguste Renoir (1841–1919), Detail of Dance at Bougival,
1883, oil on canvas,
71 5/8 x 38 5/8 in. (181.9 x 98.1 cm)
Museum of Fine Arts, Boston, Picture Fund
Photo: ARTstor

Quite risqué for the time, the young female dancer wears no gloves. Skin touches skin as her partner’s left hand holds firmly to her uncovered right wrist. She rests her left hand gently about his neck. Their body language - faces near as the male bends toward her - suggests intimacy and seduction. Their dance embrace contrasts the more accepted hand to shoulder and palm to palm placement. As to be expected, the rendering of clothes is superb. The young woman’s red-trimmed frock swirls with the music and accentuates her luscious form.

Pierre-Auguste Renoir (1841–1919), Detail of Dance at Bougival,
1883, oil on canvas,
71 5/8 x 38 5/8 in. (181.9 x 98.1 cm)
Museum of Fine Arts, Boston, Picture Fund
Photo: ARTstor

Ground litter, made up of cigarettes butts, spent matches, small bouquet, leaf and flower, allude to pleasures enjoyed.

Pierre-Auguste Renoir (1841–1919), Detail of Dance at Bougival,
1883, oil on canvas,
71 5/8 x 38 5/8 in. (181.9 x 98.1 cm)
Museum of Fine Arts, Boston, Picture Fund
Photo: ARTstor

In the left background, a women, with her left hand under her chin, converses with the man seated at the same table. As if not to miss a word, she tilts her chair forward, balancing on its two front legs. He nonchalantly smokes a cigarette. Their unfinished drinks suggest slight intoxication. Behind them, a gentleman wearing a top hat approaches, perhaps to listen or enter into the chat.

Renoir typically used friends and colleagues for models. In Dance in the City, Suzanne Valadon, artist and model, partners with the writer and journalist Paul Lhote. Lhote also appears in Dance in the Country with Aline Charigot, the painter’s mistress and subsequent wife.

The couple depicted in Dance at Bougival had been difficult to determine. They resemble Valadon and Llote but not close enough to convince. The issue was clarified when an X-ray of the painting uncovered an earlier version of the female dancer. She looked like Aline Charigot. The final image reflects a mixture of Valadon and Charigot.

The male dancer was more likely based on Hippolyte-Alphonese Fournaise, the son of the owner of the Fournaise restaurant located in Chatou.  Like Bougival, Chatou was a popular weekend gathering spot about nine miles from Paris and accessible by railroad.

Pierre-Auguste Renoir (1841-1919), Luncheon of the Boating Party, 1880-1881,
oil on canvas, 51 1/4 x 69 1/8 in. (130.175 x 175.5775 cm),
The Phillips Collection, Washington, DC
Photo: ARTstor

Renoir began to go to there in the 1870s and he used the restaurant as a setting for the Phillips Collection’s Luncheon of the Boating Party. Llote, Charigot and Fourniase are in this painting.

Pierre-Auguste Renoir (1841-1919), Detail of Luncheon of the Boating Party,
1880-1881, oil on canvas,
51 1/4 x 69 1/8 in. (130.175 x 175.5775 cm),
The Phillips Collection, Washington, DC
Photo: ARTstor

Llote is in the right rear between the gentleman wearing a black hat (the bureaucrat Eugène-Pierre Lestringuez) and a woman whose gloved hands are raised to her cheeks (the actress Jeanne Samary).

Pierre-Auguste Renoir (1841-1919), Detail of Luncheon of the Boating Party,
1880-1881, oil on canvas,
51 1/4 x 69 1/8 in. (130.175 x 175.5775 cm),
The Phillips Collection, Washington, DC
Photo: ARTstor

In the near left foreground, Charigot is seated playing with a small dog. Fournaise leans against the railing behind her.

The Dance at Bougival was last in New York in the Spring of 1886 when it was paired with Luncheon of the Boating Party at the first exhibition of Paris Impressionists in America. The Umbrellas (Les Parapluies) was also in that show. It was the only time the painting had been in the United States before the current Frick exhibition.

The works on view at Renoir, Impressionism, and Full-Length Painting may very well be the best of Renoir. No one knows if they will ever be together again. Make a visit.

Hint: The museum’s Spanish paintings and two full-length Whistler portraits were moved to the Oval Room for the duration of the show. Take a look. The impact of Renoir’s revolutionary style will intensify.

Renoir, Impressionism, and Full-Length Painting
February 7, 2012, through May 13, 2012
1 East 70th Street, Manhattan, New York
Tuesday through Saturday, 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
Sundays, 11:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
Closed Mondays and holidays

Extended Hours Event: Renoir Night
Date: Friday, April 27, 2012, 6:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m.

Tuesday, January 3, 2012



 Happy New Year!


2012


Start the year with 
a picture and poem.


Edouard Manet (1832 - 1883), 
1862-63, oil on canvas,
unframed: 37 5/16 x 44 3/4 in. (94.7 x 113.7 cm)
framed: 46 7/8 x 54 5/16 in. (119 x 138 cm)



A Great Number 
by Wislawa Szymborska 


Four billion people on this earth of ours,
but my imagination is unchanged.
It does not do well with great numbers.
It is still moved by what is individual.
Flitting through darkness like a flashing beam,
it picks out only the faces that are nearest,
meanwhile the rest are lost to blind oversight,
non-thought and non-regret.
Dante himself could not have prevented that.
And what if one is not?
Even with all the muses at my back.


Non omnis moriar - a worriment that's premature.
Yet am I fully alive, and is that enough?
It was never enough, now more than ever.
Choosing I reject, there is no other way,
yet that which I reject is more numerous,
more dense, more clamorous then ever before.
At the cost of losses indescribable - a little poem, a sigh.
To this thunderous Calling I reply in a whisper.
How much I pass over in silence, I will not say.
A mouse at the foot of the maternal mountain.
Life lasts but a few scratches of the claw in the sand.


My dreams - even they are not, as is proper, inhabited.
There's more in them of solitude than crowds and tumult.
Someone long dead may drop by for a moment.
The handle is moved by a lone hand.
The empty house is crowded round with annexes of echoes.
I run from the doorstep down into the tranquil
valley that seems to be no one's, already anachronistic.


Where this space within me comes from still -
that I do not know.
(1976)


Addendum: Wislawa Szymborska (born July 2, 1923) died February 1, 2012 at her home in Krakow, Poland. She received the 1996 Nobel Prize in Literature.

Tuesday, December 13, 2011

Rauschenberg's Friends

Andy Warhol, Robert Rauschenberg, 1967,
acrylic and silkscreen ink on linen,
14 x 10 1/4 in. (35.6 x 26 cm),
© Andy Warhol. Courtesy Gagosian Gallery.
Photography by Robert McKeever.
Collection of the Robert Rauschenberg Revocable Trust

You go to someone’s home, observe what’s around, meet their friends and, from this input, gain a better understanding of the person. Similarly, for more insight into an artist and what he or she does, look at what he or she collects.

The exhibition, The Private Collection of Robert Rauschenberg at the Gagosian Gallery offers this opportunity. Curated by Ealen Wingate, the director of Gagosian’s 24th Street gallery, the show provides visual evidence of Robert Rauschenberg’s extensive interests and intimacies. It makes obvious the collection's inclusive quality which links it to the artist's own work - silk screens and Combines which may include anything and everything.

Installation view of The Private Collection of Robert Rauschenberg
© Gagosian Gallery.
Photography by Robert McKeever.
Collection of the Robert Rauschenberg Revocable Trust

From left to right:

Jean Tinquely, Untitiled, 1962,
brick, metal, feather, tape and motor,
21 x 10 1/2 x 8 in. (53.3 x 26.7 x 20.3 cm)

Unknown, Mali (Bamana), Power Object (Boli)
wood, clay, organic substances such as earth, sacrificial blood,
bark, honey, chewed kola nut, millet and beet,
15 x 20 x 6 1/2 in. (38.1 x 50.8 x 16.5 cm)

Unknown Amazon, Tribal Costumes, 20th Century,
beaten bark, string, balsa wood,
73 x 25 in. (185.4 x 63.5 cm)

Some 145 works which the artist acquired through gifts, exchanges, or purchases are on view. There are paintings, drawings, sculptures, sketches, letters, notes, photographs, musical notations, tribal artifacts, and other items held on to for private reasons. The installation, which takes over three of the gallery's floors, entices visitors with interesting juxtapositions and surprises. Since archival material is scarce, determining how and when pieces were obtained is difficult.

Installation view of The Private Collection of Robert Rauschenberg
© Gagosian Gallery.
Photography by Robert McKeever.
Collection of the Robert Rauschenberg Revocable Trust

From left to right:

Andy Warhol, Gem, 1979,
acrylic, silkscreen ink, and diamond dust on linen,
54 x 86 in. (137.2 x 218.4 cm)

John Chamberlain, Untitled, c. 1965,
painted and chroium plated steel,
43 x 35 1/2 x 26 in. (109.2 x 90.2 x 66 cm)

James Rosenquist, Spaghetti, 1965,
oil on linen,
30 x 30 in. (76.2 x 76.2 cm)

There are works by Rauschenberg’s close friends Cy Twombly and Jasper Johns as well as other contemporaries like Andy Warhol, Claes Oldenburg, Frank Stella, Öyvind Fahlström, James Rosenquist, and John Chamberlain. Women artists include Elaine Sturtevant, Susan Weil and Niki de Saint Phalle. Among a younger generation are Brice Marsden, Damian Hirst, Ed Ruscha and Al Taylor. Photographers represented include Hans Namuth, Robert Mapplethorpe, Mathew Brady, and Eadweard Muybridge. Materials by choreographers and composers such as Philip Glass, John Cage, Merce Cunningham and Trish Brown are also here. In addition, there are modern masters like Henri Matisse, Kurt Schwitters, Marcel Duchamp, René Magritte and Francis Picabia. The variety attests to Rauschenberg's gregarious and generous nature. 

Many items were made for Rauschenberg and inscribed - For Bob, Marcel (Marcel Duchamp), For Bob, B. Marsden (Brice Marden), Flowers for Bob, Cy (Cy Twombly), Token for Bob, Trish Brown, For Bob, Al Tayor, Pour Robert, Tinguely (Jean Tinguely) and more. Merce Cunningham’s 1993 pen on paper, Choreography Instructions, has on its reverse a letter which describes the dance and ends with the wish: “I hope you will help us do this.”

Installation view of The Private Collection of Robert Rauschenberg
© Gagosian Gallery.
Photography by Robert McKeever.
Collection of the Robert Rauschenberg Revocable Trust

Clockwise from top left to right:

Andy Warhol, Eggs, 1982,
Acrylic and silkscreen enamel on canvas,
8 x 8 in. (20.3 x 20.3 cm)

Elaine Sturtevant, Untitled, 1967,
silkscreen on canvas,
40 x 32 3/8 in. (101.6 x 82.2 cm)

Jean Tinquely, Saint Phalle, 1961,
wood stool, wire and pigments,
28 1/2 x 14 x 16 1/2 in. (72.4 x 35.6 41.9 cm)

The show presents something for everyone. Two photographs of stores are sumptuous in detailing. Themes of sales and foreign lands, various objects, shapes, textures, layers of space and the mechanically made would surely have intrigued Rauschenberg. Eugene Atget’s Shop, Halles Market, 1925, is all reflections and ambiguous layers of planes. Hung below is Kusakabe Kimbei’s The Silk Store, c. 1890. Although black and white, Kimbei’s image of overlapping textile patterns appears colorful.

Duchamp’s pencil drawing, Peasant’s Leg, 1904-05, is adjacent to Magritte’s 1963 Study for the Well of Truth, a pastel depicting a trouser leg. Seen together, they illicit concepts of rural and urban, formal and informal as well as what constitutes suburb draftsmanship.

Twombly’s 1970 and 1982 “Flowers for Bob” were birthday pictures made for Rauschenberg. The graphite and crayon earlier work could pass for a Matisse or Bonnard design.

Cy Twombly, Untitled, 1953,
oil based house paint on canvas,
52 1/8 x 52 1/8 in. (132.4 x 132.4 cm),
© Cy Twombly. Courtesy Gagosian Gallery.
Photography by Robert McKeever.
Collection of the Robert Rauschenberg Foundation

Not often seen are two early career pieces. One is by Hirst, Expanded from Small Red Wheel, a 1985 assemblage-like construction; the other is by Twombly, a suggestive black and white canvas, Untitled, 1953. The latter reminiscent of Jean Dubuffet’s late 1940s and early 1950s paintings,

Although some important works by Johns had been sold in the 1980s to support the artist’s international project ROCI - Rauschenberg Overseas Cultural Interchange - significant things remain such as the encaustic Map of 1960 and 1958 papier-mâché Flashlight II.

The exhibit has many things that simply delight. Marden’s elegance is nicely exemplified by Study for Lot, 1968 and Untitled Drawing, 1965. Ruscha’s 1980 Romeo, With Contraceptive Ghost is alluring. Warhol’s portraits of the artist are touching. Alexander Calder’s 1925 Study of a Chicken amuses. Fahlström’s Unititled Cutout, c. 1973, provokes thought.

On the fourth floor, opposite the building’s two main elevators, is a blown-up, mural-size photograph of Rauschenberg in his studio. The image is filled with works from the artist’s collection. You can clearly recognize Marcel Duchamp’s Bottle Rack (aka Bottle dryer) and two of Tinquely’s constructions, Radio No. 1 and Saint Phalle.   The photo is a record of how Rauschenberg lived with these artworks on a daily basis.  
Many exhibition pieces are for sale to benefit the Robert Rauschenberg Foundation. Established by the artist in 1990, the Foundation engages in philanthropic activities supporting artists, arts education, environmental and humanitarian endeavors.

A catalogue of selected works from the collection is in progress.

The Private Collection of Robert Rauschenberg
November 3, 2011 - December 23, 2011
980 Madison Avenue, Manhattan, New York
Tuesday - Saturday 10:00 am - 6:00 pm

Thursday, November 24, 2011

Perceiving the Master in Braque

Georges Braque (1882-1963), Still Life with Guitar I (Red Tablecloth), 1936,
oil on canvas, 38 1/4 x 51 in. (97.2 x 129.5 cm),
Gift of R.H. Norton, 47.46
The Norton Museum of Art, West Palm Beach, Florida
© 2011 Artists Rights Society (ARS), New York / ADAGP, Paris

You won’t find a more revelatory exhibition than Acquavella Galleries' Georges Braque: Pioneer of Modernism. Forty-one paintings and papiers collés on loan from over seventeen American and European museums, foundations and private collections illuminate Braque’s achievements and the Cubist art movement he originated with Pablo Picasso (1881-1973). This beautifully installed show spans Braque’s career from Fauvism through Analytic and Synthetic Cubism, to his mid-twentieth-century still lifes and studio canvases. It includes works never before on public view. Quite simply, this is the greatest U. S. Braque exhibit since the Guggenheim’s 1988 retrospective and, before that, the 1949 show at the Museum of Modern Art. *


Georges Braque (1882-1963) , Landscape at L’Estaque, 1906,
oil canvas, 23 5/8 x 31 7/8 in. (60 x 81 cm),
Merzbacher Kunststiftung, Küsnacht, Switzerland
© 2011 Artists Rights Society (ARS), New York / ADAGP, Paris

The Acquavella exhibit begins with five vibrant Fauvist paintings (1906-1907) whose colors are intensified by the muted earth tones of six Cubist canvases (1907-1914) nearby. They are all astoundingly pristine, as if painted yesterday. No reflective glass impairs the spectator's vision - a treat true for over a dozen other works on view.

Georges Braque (1882-1963), Houses at L’Estaque, 1907,
0il canvas, 21 1/2 x 18 1/8 in. (54.5 x 46 cm),
Private International Collection

By 1907, Braque had absorbed the lessons of Paul Cézanne (1839-1906) whose Paris posthumous retrospective took place that September. Houses at L’Estaque, 1907, could not be more Cézanne-like. Its hillside of cascading earth-toned geometric shapes speaks profoundly of the elder artist’s influence. Paintings in browns and grays follow. Their flattened perspective, fragmented forms and multiple vantage points mark the evolution of Analytic Cubism.

When objects shattered into fragments appeared in my painting about 1909; this for me was a way of getting closest to the object....Fragmentation helped me to establish space and movement in space.
Georges Braque (undated)**


Georges Braque (1882-1963), Harbor, 1909,
oil on canvas, 16 x 19 in. (40.5 x 48 cm),
National Gallery of Art, Washington
© 2011 Artists Rights Society (ARS), New York / ADAGP, Paris

Of particular note are two 1909 harbor scenes where only a few elements - a hulk, mast or lighthouse - allude to the subject. Midline in the smaller, more abstract harbor canvas is a vertical mast. A bold compositional risk, the upright both splits the painting in two and anchors the composition.

"I felt dissatisfied with traditional perspective. Merely a mechanical process, this perspective never conveys things in full. It starts from one viewpoint and never gets away from it."
George Braque (1954)**


Georges Braque (1882-1963), Céret, Rooftops, 1911,
0il canvas, 34 3/4 x 25 1/2 in. (88.5 x 65 cm),
Private Collection

As Analytic Cubism matured, objects became so thoroughly examined and broken down that they ceased to be identifiable. Two paintings from private collections, Still Life with Metronome of 1909-10 and the 1911 Céret, Rooftops, are outstanding examples. Their fractured imagery attracts close scrutiny. Looking is akin to examining a multi-faceted gem.

To avoid a projection towards infinity I am interposing overlaid planes a short way off. To make it understood that things are in front of each other instead of being scattered in space..”
Georges Braque (1961)**


Georges Braque (1882-1963), Glass, Bottle and Newspaper, 1912,
charcoal and faux-bois wallpaper on paper,
18 7/8 x 24 3/8 in. (48 x 62 cm),
Fondation Beyeler, Riehen/Basel, Switzerland

Braque invented papier collé, a technique of pasting paper on paper. This form of collage is characteristic of Synthetic Cubism, the movement's second phase. For this viewer, Braque’s papiers collés are some of the most poetic works ever created. Using cut outs from newspapers, wallpapers, or cardboards, he formed pictures of layered flat planes, each stratum differentiated by forms, shapes, signs, and materials. They are simple yet complex, like haiku poems. Glass, Bottle and Newspaper, 1912, and Bottle and Musical Instruments, 1918, are among the highlights here.

...I began to concentrate on still-life’s [sic], because in the still-life you have a tactile, I might almost say a manual space....This answered to the hankering I have always had to touch things and not merely see them. It was this space that particularly attracted me....In tactile space you measure the distance separating you from the object, whereas in visual space you measure the distance separating things from each other. This is what led me, long ago, from landscape to still-life.
Georges Braque (1954)**

In his later paintings, Braque leaves landscapes behind and brings back some Fauvist color. Once again, objects are recognizable. Motifs from his earlier Cubist pieces remain, such as stringed instruments or a musical scores. These are cerebral works, although a palpable quality gives them a certain sensuality.

Georges Braque (1882-1963), The Billiard Table, 1944-52,
oil with sand and charcoal on canvas
71 2/4 x 38 1/2 in. (181 x 97.8 cm),
The Metropolitan Museum of Art
Jacques & Natasha Gelman Collection, 1998 (1999.363.9)
© 2011 Artists Rights Society (ARS), New York / ADAGP, Paris

The show culminates with late 1930s through mid-1950s paintings of studio interiors, billiard tables, and still lifes. These large works of recurring subjects and themes masterly merge great complexity with complete control.  

Georges Braque (1882-1963), Gueridon, 1935,
0il and sand on canvas, 71 x 29 in. (180.34 x 73.66 cm),
San Francisco Museum of Modern Art
Purchase with the aid of funds from W.W. Crocker
© 2011 Artists Rights Society (ARS), New York / ADAGP, Paris

Table-top arrangements proliferate. Gueridon, 1935, The Yellow Tablecloth, 1935, Still Life with Guitar (Red Tablecloth), 1936, and The Mauve Tablecloth, 1936, entice with their similarities and differences. In these works, a table laden with objects is seen in a room with wainscoting and decorative patterned walls. In both the Mauve and Yellow Tablecloth canvases, an anthropomorphic half-shadowed bottle with a curlicue top occupies center position on a table’s uppermost area. The bottle seems to be looking at us through the picture plane.

Georges Braque (1882-1963), The Mauve Tablecloth, 1936,
oil canvas, 33 1/2 x 51 1/2 in. (85 x 131 cm),
Private Collection

The exhibition makes clear Braque’s remarkable accomplishments, as well as his impact on what was to come. Flat planes with their accumulation of the depicted and the real connect to the work of Jasper Johns and Robert Rauschenberg, especially the latter’s Combines. In addition, the use of material from mass culture points the way to Pop Art.

The Austrian critic and art historian Dieter Buchhart curated the show and contributed essays to the accompanying catalogue, along with the scholars Isabelle Monod-Fontaine and Richard Shiff.

Although the exhibit takes place in a commercial gallery whose business is selling art, no work is for sale. The show is free and open to the public. Acquavella Galleries deserves much praise for making it happen.

Let's hope it won't be decades before we see more of this modern master.

*The Museum of Modern Art’s 1949 retrospective was done in collaboration with the Cleveland Museum of Art where it was also seen. At that time, it was the largest Braque exhibition ever held in the United States.
**Source of artist statements: Famous artist, great painters quotes + biography, Braque.

Georges Braque: Pioneer of Modernism
October 12, 2011 - November 30, 2011
18 East 79th Street, Manhattan, New York
Monday - Saturday, 10:00 am to 5:00 pm